HomeNewsAppeal Court stops Federal High Court from hearing Kano Emirate case

Appeal Court stops Federal High Court from hearing Kano Emirate case

Date:

Related stories

Appeal Court upholds Abure as Labour Party chairman

The Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, has upheld Julius...

INEC removes 7,746 deceased voters from register

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has confirmed the...

Kano Anti-Corruption Commission seizes over 1,000 plots of land

The Kano State Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission has...

Shehu Sani comments on Kano Emirate dispute using football analogy

Former Kaduna Central Senator Shehu Sani has taken to...

Governors’ Forum backs tax reforms, supports new VAT formula

The Nigeria Governors' Forum (NGF) has reiterated its strong...
spot_img

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja has ruled that the Federal High Court in Kano lacks jurisdiction to handle the ongoing legal dispute surrounding the Kano Emirate.

READ ALSO: Kano Governor meets NSA Ribadu amid emirate crisis

Delivering the lead judgment, Justice Gabriel Kolawole emphasized that the Federal High Court has no authority to hear chieftaincy-related cases.

He stated, “The Federal High Court does not have jurisdiction over chieftaincy matters,” and ordered that the case be referred to the Kano State High Court, which he deemed the proper forum for such disputes.

Presiding Justice Mustapha Mohammed and another member of the panel agreed with Justice Kolawole’s conclusion regarding the Federal High Court’s lack of jurisdiction. However, they expressed disagreement with the directive to remit the case to the Kano State High Court. Instead, they recommended that the case be struck out entirely, arguing that it should not be transferred to the Kano State judiciary.

In their majority decision, the court ruled that matters pertaining to chieftaincy affairs in Kano State are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Kano State High Court. As a result, the proceedings initiated at the Federal High Court were struck out, reaffirming that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the case from the outset.

Subscribe

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here